Skip to content

Policy & regulation

AI policy and government oversight: legislation, export controls and global governance frameworks.

325 picksRelated topicsIndustrySafety & alignmentTrends

Latest picks

321–325 of 325

Feb 1, 2025Saturday

OpenAI News

OpenAI banned accounts using AI to fake job applicants and land remote roles

OpenAI disclosed in a February 2025 threat report that it banned dozens of accounts tied to a deceptive employment scheme. The accounts used its models to generate fake résumés, fake references, and real-time interview answers to land remote jobs at Western companies. The tactics match what Microsoft and Google previously attributed to North Korean IT-worker fraud, though OpenAI says it cannot confirm the actors' locations or nationalities. Once hired, they kept using the models for coding tasks and to invent cover stories for skipping video calls.

Why it matters: OpenAI's own threat intel report details account bans tied to a deceptive hiring scheme—fake resumes, real-time interview cheating, and post-hire cover stories—with links to DPRK IT worker activity. It's a first-party enforcement action with concrete TTPs, not a generic safety...

Jan 13, 2025Monday

OpenAI News

OpenAI’s Economic Blueprint

OpenAI published its Economic Blueprint on January 13, 2025, arguing the US should use nationwide AI rules and invest in chips, data, energy, and talent. The post cites $175 billion in global funds waiting for AI projects and says OpenAI will launch its Innovating for America effort at a January 30 event in Washington, DC. The real signal is policy, not product: it argues against state-by-state regulation, and the February 20 update only says it added federal AI workforce proposals.

Why it matters: This is an official OpenAI policy memo, not a product launch. HKR-K comes from the $175B investment figure and a clear federal-over-state regulatory stance; HKR-R comes from chips, energy, talent, and regulatory pressure points. HKR-H is weaker, so it lands near the featured floo

Dec 27, 2024Friday

OpenAI News

Why OpenAI’s structure must evolve to advance our mission

OpenAI says its board is evaluating changes to its nonprofit/for-profit structure, after estimating in 2019 that AGI would require about $10B. The post cites ChatGPT’s 300M+ weekly users and $137M in 2015 donations, but the specific final structure under consideration is not fully disclosed in the provided text. The key signal is financing pressure: OpenAI says investors at this scale want more conventional equity.

Nov 4, 2024Monday

OpenAI News

OpenAI’s comments to the NTIA on data center growth, resilience, and security

OpenAI said on Nov. 4, 2024 that it submitted comments to the US NTIA, arguing a single 5GW data center can create or support about 40,000 jobs. The post cites $17B-$20B in state GDP impact per 5GW site and says $175B in global infrastructure funds are waiting to be deployed. The real signal is policy and AI infrastructure, not a model launch; the post does not disclose new model specs or product timelines.

Why it matters: Authoritative OpenAI policy filing. HKR-K is supported by the 5GW, jobs, GDP, and capital figures; HKR-R comes from compute supply and energy constraints. HKR-H is weak because there is no model or product update, so this sits at the low end of featured.

Oct 24, 2024Thursday

OpenAI News

OpenAI’s approach to AI and national security

After the White House issued an AI National Security Memorandum on October 24, 2024, OpenAI published a framework for national security partnerships and said each use case goes through formal review by its Product Policy and National Security teams. The post names 3 existing examples: DARPA cyber defense work, USAID using ChatGPT to cut administrative burden, and bioscience collaboration with Los Alamos National Laboratory; it does not disclose pricing, model versions, or contract size. The key signal is the boundary: OpenAI says its policies ban uses that harm people, destroy property, or develop weapons, while it explores research, logistics, translation, summarization, and civilian-harm mitigation use cases with the U.S. and allies.

Why it matters: This is not a product launch, so HKR-H is weak. HKR-K and HKR-R pass on the concrete review process, 3 existing projects, and explicit weapons bans, but missing contract scale, model versions, and outcome data keep it at the low end of featured.