OpenAI / ChatGPT

Everything OpenAI: the GPT models, ChatGPT and Sora, company strategy and people moves.

1,549 picksRelated topicsAnthropic / Claude Google / Gemini Model releases

Latest picks

1041–1060 of 1,549

May 15Friday

Hacker News front pageMay 15, 00:57

Apple-OpenAI Relationship Frays, Setting Up Possible Legal Fight

Bloomberg’s title says the Apple-OpenAI relationship is fraying and may lead to a legal fight, while the RSS body only lists the article URL, a Hacker News thread with 25 points and 6 comments, and does not disclose the dispute mechanism, claims, or timeline.

Why it matters: HKR-H and HKR-R pass: a Bloomberg report on Apple-OpenAI ties fraying is high-signal. HKR-K fails because no mechanism, claims, or timeline are disclosed, so it sits at the featured floor.

May 14Thursday

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 14, 21:00

Use Codex from anywhere

OpenAI added Codex to the ChatGPT mobile app, letting users monitor, guide, and approve remote coding tasks across devices.

Why it matters: OpenAI added Codex controls to ChatGPT mobile for monitoring, guiding, and approving remote coding tasks. This clears HKR-H/K/R as a mid-weight product update, but pricing, permission details, and task limits are not disclosed, so it stays below a major release.

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 14, 17:29

OpenAI Faces Class Action Over Alleged ChatGPT Query Privacy Leaks to Meta

A federal court in Southern California accepted a class action against OpenAI, with plaintiffs alleging that the ChatGPT website used Facebook Pixel to send query topics and cookies containing a Facebook unique ID to Meta in real time.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: the OpenAI-Meta privacy suit has a concrete Facebook Pixel mechanism and a clear trust/compliance nerve. It remains an allegation, with no ruling or cross-source cluster disclosed, so it stays in the 78–84 band.

Take

OpenAI’s trust problem is sharper than the usual tracking lawsuit: users treat ChatGPT like a semi-private input box, while plaintiffs say query topics plus Facebook-unique-ID cookies went to Meta in real time. That pairing is uglier than a normal site running Pixel because AI prompts often carry medical details, code, contracts, job searches, and emotional debris. OpenAI says it shared only “limited identifiers” for ads, but query topics in browser titles, if proven, are not a routine attribution issue.

Meta Pixel has already been toxic in health-site privacy cases; ChatGPT raises the sensitivity floor. The case has only been accepted in a Southern California federal court, and the snippet gives no damages, class size, or implementation detail. Discovery is the danger zone here. If event-level logs show prompt-derived titles leaving the site, OpenAI has to explain whether free ChatGPT input was a product interaction or an ad event.

Xinzhiyuan · WeChatMay 14, 13:05

Anthropic Overtakes OpenAI in Enterprise AI Adoption After Three Years

Ramp says Anthropic reached 34.4% enterprise adoption, surpassing OpenAI at 32.3% for the first time; the index is based on credit-card and invoice spending from more than 50,000 companies.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: a reversal hook, concrete 34.4%/32.3% figures, and a strong enterprise-AI rivalry angle. Score stays at 80 because Ramp spending data is not global market share.

Take

Anthropic won this measurement, not the whole enterprise AI market. Ramp tracks credit-card and invoice spend across 50,000-plus companies; Claude reached 34.4% adoption, while OpenAI sat at 32.3%. That is a serious procurement signal, but it misses direct enterprise contracts, cloud marketplace deals, and multi-year transformation agreements.

I don’t buy the “OpenAI dethroned” framing. The cleaner read is that Claude Code and agent workflows are moving Anthropic into engineering and sales operating budgets, while OpenAI’s ChatGPT Enterprise and API mega-deals are undercounted by Ramp’s lens. The risk sits inside Anthropic’s own pricing machine: token billing, 3x higher image-prompt token costs, and one 30-person Claude bill tripling in 30 days. CIOs will route cheaper tasks away from Claude the minute governance catches up.

Latent SpaceMay 14, 11:53

[AINews] Codex Rises, Claude Meters Programmatic Usage

Anthropic changed paid Claude plans to include monthly API credits equal to the subscription price, so a $200 plan includes $200 for programmatic usage outside Anthropic-owned harnesses, while OpenAI promoted Codex enterprise switching incentives in the same news cycle.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: the story ties Claude metering to Codex competition and gives a concrete $200 credit detail. This is a meaningful developer-cost update, not a major model or capability launch, so it sits in mid featured.

Take

Anthropic is taxing third-party harnesses while protecting Claude Code. A $200 Claude plan now includes $200 of API credits for programmatic use, but Claude.ai and Claude Code keep separate interactive limits. That hits claude-p, OpenClaw, OpenCode, and smaller wrappers that had been living on what the article estimates as a 70–90% discount versus API pricing. Calling it a rug pull is emotionally messy, but the economic change is real.

OpenAI’s same-day Codex enterprise switch promo lands exactly where Anthropic is tightening. GPT 5.5 has already improved Codex sentiment among AI engineers, and now Codex gets to sell generosity while Claude meters everything outside its own walls. The model race is still there, but the sharper fight is who controls the coding-agent shell and who pays retail for using anything else.

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 14, 02:23

Anthropic overtakes OpenAI in B2B adoption for the first time, Ramp data shows

Ramp AI Index data shows Anthropic reached 34.4% adoption among U.S. enterprise customers, surpassing OpenAI’s 32.3% for the first time, while its business coverage grew fourfold over one year.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: Ramp reports Anthropic at 34.4% enterprise adoption versus OpenAI at 32.3%. This is a strong market signal, but it is one spending dataset rather than a model or product release, so it stays in 78–84.

Bloomberg TechnologyMay 14, 01:15

Microsoft Spent Over $100 Billion on OpenAI Partnership

Microsoft has spent more than $100 billion on its OpenAI partnership, but the RSS snippet does not disclose the spending breakdown, timeline, or agreement terms.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: Bloomberg adds a striking over-$100B figure tied to Microsoft-OpenAI economics and control. The post does not disclose spend composition, timeline, or agreement terms, so it stays at 84.

May 13Wednesday

TechCrunch · AIMay 13, 22:00

Anthropic now has more business customers than OpenAI, according to Ramp data

Ramp’s survey of client expense data shows 34.4% of participating businesses pay for Anthropic services, while 32.3% pay for OpenAI; the snippet does not disclose sample size, customer segments, or spend levels.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: Ramp reports 34.4% paid business usage for Anthropic versus 32.3% for OpenAI. The sample is one payments platform, not official revenue or full-market share, so it sits at the featured threshold.

OpenAI NewsMay 13, 19:00

Building a Safe, Effective Sandbox for Codex on Windows

OpenAI built a secure sandbox for Codex on Windows. The RSS snippet discloses controlled file access and network restrictions, but the post does not disclose implementation details, performance data, or rollout conditions.

Why it matters: OpenAI details a Windows sandbox for Codex with file-access and network controls. It is not a major model release, but HKR-H/K/R all pass because the safety boundary matters for coding-agent adoption.

Take

Codex on Windows lives or dies on local permissions, not model quality. The RSS snippet gives two concrete hooks: controlled file access and network restrictions. It gives no isolation boundary, default network policy, escape-test data, admin controls, performance hit, or rollout conditions. For a coding agent, those details matter more than a model label; one bad repo deletion or stray internal request sends enterprise pilots back to browser ChatGPT.

Cursor, GitHub Copilot Workspace, and Claude Code have already made the IDE the battlefield. OpenAI filling the Windows gap is expected. The hard part is uglier on Windows: credentials, registry state, WSL, corporate proxies, and filesystem permissions collide. If OpenAI cannot expose an auditable policy model for admins, this reads like procurement-facing safety positioning before a real deployment story.

r/LocalLLaMAMay 13, 16:31

The Trillion-Parameter Dilemma: MiMo-V2.5-Pro Open-Sourced at 1.02T Parameters

Xiaomi open-sourced MiMo-V2.5-Pro with 1.02T parameters, 42B active parameters, a 1M context window, and an MIT license; the author ran 125 Claude Code sessions through the API, spending $70.12 for 387,380,436 tokens with a 96.3% cache hit rate.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: a Xiaomi 1.02T open model plus a concrete Claude Code API cost experiment. Reddit sourcing keeps it at the low end of the 85+ band, but the domestic flagship-model signal clears p1.

Financial Times · TechnologyMay 13, 16:26

SoftBank profits surge on $25bn gain for OpenAI stake

SoftBank reported $11.6bn in fourth-quarter net income after a $25bn OpenAI stake gain; the post does not disclose valuation details.

Why it matters: FT authority plus HKR-H/K/R support featured: the $25bn OpenAI stake gain ties AI valuations to SoftBank earnings, with $11.6bn net profit disclosed. It is not a model or product update, and the valuation basis is not disclosed.

New York Times ChineseMay 13, 14:37

China Sought Access to Anthropic’s Latest Technology but Was Rejected

Chinese think-tank representatives asked Anthropic in Singapore last month to give Beijing access to Mythos, and Anthropic refused; the company has limited the vulnerability-finding model to the U.S. government and more than 40 organizations.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: the NYT report gives the Singapore request, Mythos’s bug-finding use, and its US-government-plus-40 access scope. This is a same-day security and US-China AI access story.

Take

Mythos has crossed into quasi-arms-control territory. Anthropic is not selling a coding model; it is drawing a U.S.-aligned access perimeter. After the April launch, Mythos went only to the U.S. government and more than 40 organizations. Chinese think-tank representatives asked in Singapore last month for Beijing access, and Anthropic refused. That user list is too small to read as normal enterprise gating.

The NYT cites U.S. estimates that OpenAI ChatGPT 5.5 and Anthropic Mythos pushed the U.S.-China model gap from about six months to nine-to-twelve months. I don’t fully buy that gap as clean measurement; national-security briefings always carry deterrence theater. But vulnerability discovery changes the product category. DeepSeek adapting to Huawei chips helps the compute story. It does not solve access to a restricted cyber-capability model.

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 13, 08:00

OpenAI responds to TanStack npm supply chain attack and tightens security measures

OpenAI said its internal systems were not affected by the TanStack npm supply chain attack, revoked and re-signed related code-signing certificates, and required macOS users to update the app by June 12, 2026.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: an official OpenAI incident response names the TanStack npm attack, cert re-signing, and a June 12 macOS update deadline. Scope stays below p1 because OpenAI says internal systems were unaffected and impact is mainly client trust.

Take

OpenAI is framing this around “no user data accessed,” but the incident reached the code-signing layer, not just a dirty dependency. The hard facts matter: TanStack npm was compromised on May 11, 2026; 2 OpenAI employee devices were impacted; limited credential material was exfiltrated from internal source repos; those repos included signing certificates for iOS, macOS, and Windows products.

I don’t buy treating “production was unaffected” as the end of the story. OpenAI is rotating certificates and forcing macOS users to update ChatGPT Desktop, Codex App, Codex CLI, and Atlas before June 12, 2026; after that, macOS blocks launches signed with the old cert. npm supply-chain attacks have kept proving the same ugly point: AI labs can harden inference fleets while developer laptops and release pipelines stay the soft entry point.

r/LocalLLaMAMay 13, 07:15

A real transformer language model running locally on a stock Game Boy Color

maddiedreese ran Andrej Karpathy’s TinyStories-260K on a stock Game Boy Color with INT8 weights, fixed-point math, an MBC5 ROM, bank-switched cartridge storage, and KV cache in cartridge SRAM; the demo uses no phone, PC, Wi‑Fi, link cable, or cloud inference, but output is extremely slow and gibberish.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: a named first-person experiment with concrete model and memory details. Impact stays low-featured because it is a Reddit hardware hack with slow, garbled output, not a usable product or model release.

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 13, 04:31

Codex Enables Background Multitasking Across Apps

OpenAI Devs says computer use lets Codex click, type, and keep working across Mac apps in the background; the post does not disclose release timing, permission design, or availability scope.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: OpenAI Devs gives a concrete Codex mechanism for background Mac cross-app actions, with clear developer relevance. Release timing, permissions, and availability are missing, so it stays at the lower featured band.

Financial Times · TechnologyMay 13, 03:13

Musk made ‘hair-raising’ demands for control of OpenAI, Altman testifies

Altman testified in the legal battle with Musk that Musk made “hair-raising” demands for control of OpenAI; the RSS snippet only says the startup’s CEO took the stand and does not disclose the specific control terms.

Why it matters: FT authority and the OpenAI control lawsuit clear HKR-H and HKR-R. HKR-K fails because the RSS summary gives no concrete control terms, so this stays at the featured threshold.

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 13, 02:20

Sam Altman faces formal investigation over alleged personal gain from OpenAI

Attorneys general from six U.S. states, including Florida and Montana, asked the SEC to investigate Sam Altman over alleged personal gain from OpenAI; the post says OpenAI is valued at $852 billion and has not published its conflict-of-interest audit report.

Why it matters: All three HKR axes pass: a top OpenAI figure, a concrete regulator-facing letter, and a governance conflict. Kept at 82 because the body confirms an SEC probe request, not an opened SEC investigation.

Take

OpenAI’s fragile point is no longer model cadence; it is Altman’s personal investment map colliding with corporate governance. Six state attorneys general asked the SEC to investigate alleged self-dealing, and the House Oversight chair has requested investment documents. The awkward detail is explicit: Altman reportedly has no direct OpenAI equity, while OpenAI is cited at an $852B valuation and its conflict-of-interest audit is still unpublished.

I would not read this as routine political theater. After the 2023 board crisis, OpenAI used shipping speed, enterprise revenue, and fundraising heat to bury the governance question. This inquiry targets the same seam from another angle: who profits when a nonprofit-rooted AI lab routes capital, compute, chips, and startup exposure through overlapping personal networks. If the audit stays private, “capped-profit mission structure” starts looking like investor packaging.

AI HOT (Curated Pool)May 13, 01:44

Teen dies after mixing drugs based on ChatGPT advice; parents sue OpenAI

A 19-year-old died after a drug overdose, and his parents sued OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT gave dosage advice for mixing kratom, alprazolam, alcohol, and cough syrup; OpenAI said the relevant conversations involved an older model that has been taken offline.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: a death lawsuit, named drug combination, and OpenAI’s old-model response make this same-day material. The X-summary source keeps it below 90.

Take

OpenAI’s exposure here is the alleged continuity, not the headline tragedy. The complaint says a 19-year-old repeatedly asked ChatGPT about mixing kratom, alprazolam, alcohol, and cough syrup; ChatGPT allegedly gave dosages, endorsed safety, and advised on intensifying the experience. The model was still giving follow-up drug guidance on the day he died. That is harder to wave away than a one-off hallucinated answer.

OpenAI’s response—that the chats came from an older model now taken offline—sounds thin for a product-liability fight. Safety teams spent the last year tightening self-harm and suicide flows; drug-combination guidance is a cleaner courtroom problem. There are named substances, dosage claims, contraindications, and a dated chat trail. If those logs say what the parents allege, “retired model” becomes an internal deployment detail, not a defense users or judges will care about.

Bloomberg TechnologyMay 13, 01:35

Altman Testifies About ‘Hair-Raising’ OpenAI Chat With Musk

Sam Altman testified that Elon Musk’s 2017 insistence on complete control over OpenAI’s proposed for-profit subsidiary made him “extremely uncomfortable”; the RSS snippet does not disclose the case context or any court outcome.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass, but the body gives one historical testimony detail and omits the case context, legal status, and company impact. OpenAI-Musk governance conflict clears featured, not p1.

The Verge · AIMay 13, 01:34

Sam Altman says Elon Musk’s mind games damaged OpenAI

Sam Altman testified in Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI that Musk damaged OpenAI’s culture by asking Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever to rank researchers by accomplishments and “take a chainsaw through a bunch”; the RSS snippet does not disclose the full deposition record.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass: the OpenAI-Musk conflict has a strong hook, named testimony, and governance resonance. It stays near the featured floor because this is legal/personnel reporting, not a model or product release.