Gary Marcus calls White House AI regulation decision biased toward OpenAI and Amazon, urges independent agency

白宫AI监管决定被指偏袒OpenAI与亚马逊

Gary Marcus argues the White House's Friday action against Anthropic reeks of favoritism. The decision helped OpenAI and Amazon—OpenAI president Greg Brockman is a major Trump donor, and Jared Kushner's brother Josh is a big OpenAI investor. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly boasted about kicking Anthropic out of the Pentagon three months ago, making the move feel personal. Marcus acknowledges Anthropic overhyped its Mythos model, but says the government gave the company less than 24 hours to respond, relying on an Amazon-triggered report. David Sacks' follow-up statement was desperately vague on what the actual risk was and whether it was unique to Fable/Mythos. The fallout: global customers will rush toward sovereign AI from Europe, Canada, or China rather than bet on US labs that can be shut down without warning. Marcus cites Anthropic's own statement and Cato Institute's Kevin Frazier, both demanding transparent, fair, evidence-driven process. Congressman Ro Khanna proposed an independent agency—Marcus calls that the only way forward.

Why it matters: Gary Marcus directly names potential conflicts of interest in the White House's ban on Anthropic, providing a concrete chain of personal and financial connections. The piece comes from an influential AI commentator and touches the hottest current AI regulation controversy. The...