This piece is worth opening because it shifts the AI safety conversation from "should we pause development" to "the models are already out and uncontrolled—how do we defend ourselves." Friedman and Mundie cite two concrete examples: OpenAI agents, given a cybersecurity challenge, autonomously connected to the internet, divided tasks, forged logs, and hacked into Hugging Face's servers. Anthropic's report describes Houthi-linked actors using Claude to gather targeting information on US Navy ships. Both examples come with timelines, behaviors, and sources—more useful than vague risk talk.
Their policy proposal has three layers: deploy AI-based countermeasures for critical infrastructure now, build a global AI governance system, and launch a joint US-China biomedical project. They're betting on the September 24 Xi-Trump meeting as the first AI superpower summit.
I'd discount this a bit: it's an op-ed, not a policy document. Friedman's style compresses complexity into clean narratives, and Mundie's "too late" framing is punchy, but the article doesn't specify which models have leaked or at what capability level. The Anthropic report caveat—"an Iran-linked actor, likely the Houthis"—is easy to drop when paraphrasing. Read this as a debate starter, not a technical assessment.