What Would a Serious AI Product Look Like?
What happened
作者 Glyph 直接点名 Gemini、Claude、ChatGPT 和 Ollama，说现在的 AI 聊天工具根本没把自己的“会犯错”警告当回事，只是当成甩锅给用户的免责声明。他提了两个具体的界面想法：一是给 AI 输出的每一条结论旁边都加个复选框，逼着人去逐条核实；二是把搜索结果里的原文引用放大、放前面，AI 的总结用最小号字跟在下面。文章没提有...
Coverage
Follow the reports to see the story from different sides.
- Hacker News front pagePickWhat Would a Serious AI Product Look Like?
Glyph argues that current AI chatbots treat their own error warnings as legal disclaimers, not as a real workflow step. He proposes two concrete UI ideas: a mandatory checkbox next to every claim for human verification, and search results that put direct quotations front and center with AI summaries in small print below. The post calls out Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, and Ollama by name but does not describe any existing product that implements these features.
Heat over time
Not enough continuous observations to draw a trend yet.