AI-coded Photoshop clones criticized over performance and more
What happened
A Hacker News front-page post on October 12 criticizes AI-coded Photoshop clones, citing brush performance, file compatibility, color management and development cost. The post says brush performance drops on canvases above 8K by 8K pixels, and copy-paste and undo lag on large canvases, while Photoshop handles 100-megapixel images smoothly. The report focuses on the performance gap and raises the compatibility, color management and cost criticisms, but gives no test results for those three.
Written by AI from the coverage · updated 2 hours ago
Coverage
Follow the reports to see the story from different sides.
- Hacker News front pageAttack of the Vibe Coded Photoshop Clones
AI 编码的 Photoshop 仿制项目受到文章批评，主要问题集中在笔刷性能、文件兼容性、色彩管理和开发成本。文中称，这些项目在超过 8K x 8K pixels 的画布上笔刷性能下降，并在大画布测试中出现复制粘贴和撤销操作卡顿，相比之下 Photoshop 能流畅处理 100 megapixel 图像。
Heat over time
Not enough continuous observations to draw a trend yet.