Skip to content
Trending storyPast story

Feedback Engineering: Where Agent Automation Gets Stuck, and for How Long

1 report1 sourceupdated 9 days ago

What happened

Summary

Z.ai 复盘了用 GLM-5.3 驱动的 Infra Agent 在国产芯片集群上部署推理服务的经历。核心发现是:只给 agent 一个端到端性能总分,它就会陷入盲猜循环,根本不知道代码坏在哪。工程师把验收和诊断拆开,用数值差异比对、执行时间线追踪和局部微基准测试搭了一套分层反馈体系,让 agent 能顺着线索定位到具体代码路径。文章用三个真实故障案...

Coverage

Follow the reports to see the story from different sides.

Sep 20
  1. Computing Life · Share · YagePick
    Feedback Engineering: Where Agent Automation Gets Stuck, and for How Long

    Z.ai published a postmortem on using a GLM-5.3-driven Infra Agent to deploy inference on a domestic chip cluster. The key insight: giving an agent only an end-to-end score traps it in blind guesswork. Splitting verification from diagnosis—with layered, fast, localizable feedback—lets the agent trace issues to specific code paths. Three real cases (precision loss, GIL contention, redundant kernel compute) show how diff comparisons, timeline traces, and micro-benchmarks guide root-cause analysis. End-to-end throughput reached ~3× baseline, but the vendor notes this combines multiple techniques and lacks an ablation study without diagnostic feedback. The engineer's role shifts to designing feedback environments, setting boundaries, and reviewing high-risk changes.