Hands-on with Zhipu's flagship GLM-5: compared with Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3-Codex

智谱旗舰 GLM-5 实测：对比 Opus 4.6 和 GPT-5.3-Codex

Ruan Yifeng compared GLM-5, Claude Opus 4.6, and GPT-5.3-Codex on 4 coding tasks, and judged GLM-5 competitive with the two closed models overall. The post covers web redesign, a 3D sandbox, an Angry Birds clone, and Laravel-to-Next.js migration; in the migration task, GLM-5 and GPT-5.3 took about 5 minutes, while Opus 4.6 took about 20. The key point: this is a single-author hands-on comparison, not a standardized benchmark.

Why it matters: This clears HKR-H/K/R because it is a named first-person test with 4 tasks, video evidence, and a 5-minute versus ~20-minute gap. I did not score it higher because it is one author's evaluation, not a standardized benchmark or a broad multi-source release event.