Skip to content
r/LocalLLaMA

Using Gemma 4 E4B with LiteRT: about 2.4× faster text generation than Q4 GGUF

Using Gemma 4 E4B with the LiteRT engine - ~2.4x speedup over Q4 GGUF in text generation, image processing roughly the same

The author tested Gemma 4 E4B on an RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, where LiteRT averaged 157.2 tok/s for text generation versus 66.3 tok/s for llama.cpp Q4 GGUF; image captioning on 111 full-resolution images improved only 1.1×, at about 72 seconds versus 80 seconds.

Why it matters: HKR-H/K/R all pass, with a first-person benchmark including hardware, throughput, and sample count. Source authority is limited to one Reddit test, so it sits at the featured threshold rather than the 78+ band.

Read the original ↗Export Markdown