r/LocalLLaMAMay 3, 2026, 09:08 UTC+8

Local image generation on Mac: 10 models compared

Local image generation on Mac: 10 models compared (SD 1.5 → Flux dev → Qwen-Image → Gemini)

A Reddit user tested 10 image models on an M1 Max with 64GB RAM. Qwen-Image Lightning’s 8-step distillation beat the full model at 10 minutes versus 93. Flux dev led local photorealism but showed English-centric bias; Gemini handled kanji and context better but is cloud-only.

Why it matters: Named first-person test with concrete numbers: HKR-H from a 10-model Mac comparison, HKR-K from timing and quality deltas, HKR-R from local-vs-cloud tradeoffs. Single Reddit sample keeps it below must-write.

Read the original ↗Export Markdown

Take

Local image generation on Mac is being opened by distillation, not by bigger checkpoints. On an M1 Max with 64GB RAM, Qwen-Image Lightning’s 8-step distilled run took 10 minutes and beat the full Qwen-Image run that took 93 minutes. That gap changes the workflow from “technically runnable” to “I’ll actually wait for it.”

I still discount a single Reddit benchmark. The blocked body leaves prompt set, sampler, quantization, and resolution incomplete. The pattern is still useful: Flux dev remains the local photorealism pick, but its English-centric bias shows up fast outside Western visual priors; Gemini handles kanji and Japanese context better, but sends the job to cloud. For Mac users, the contest is no longer peak image quality. It is reproducible, acceptable output inside a coffee break.

Source: r/LocalLLaMA · reddit.com
Published: May 3, 2026, 09:08 UTC+8 · May 3, 2026